In a nationalized wellness care system, you want to know who is who – otherwise the system could by no means be capable identify who is entitled. The structure depends on how the program is created and made, but with a nationalized overall health care program you will be tracked by the state where you reside and how you move in a manner that is unseen in America. The nationalized well being care technique becomes a car for population handle.
If you leave the United States and are no longer a resident of the state, even if you are a citizen and could preserve a driving license, you will have to report promptly if you want to keep away from the 13% health care tax. I use the quantity 13% as it is in Sweden to exemplify the actual tax stress that is laid upon you for the nationalized overall health care.
Let’s say you moved and you do not want to spend the 13% tax for solutions you do not receive, can get, or want to taken out from the tax roll. The mammoth entity has no interest to let you go so easy. You will finish up getting to reveal your private life – companion, dwellings, travel, dollars, and job to prove your case that you have the suitable to leave the public overall health care program and do not have to have to spend the tax. If you have to seek an appeal, your facts could be a component of administrative court documents that are open and public documents. As quickly as you return to the United States, you will be automatically enrolled again and the taxes commence to pile up.
Public universal health care has no interest in guarding your privacy. 薑黃粉 want their tax dollars and, to fight for your rights, you will have to prove that you meet the specifications to not be taxable. In that method, your private life is up for display.
The national ID-card and national population registry that includes your medical details is a foundation of the nationalized well being care program. You can see where this is going – population handle and potential to use the law and health care access to map your whole private life in public searchable databases owned and operated by the government.
By operating an impeccable population registry that tracks exactly where you live, who you live with, when you move and your citizen status including residency the Swedes can separate who can obtain universal well being care from these not entitled. The Swedish authorities will know if you have a Swedish social safety quantity, with the tap of the keyboard, much more info about yourself than you can remember. The Swedish government has taken sharing of details in between agencies to a new level. The cause is very very simple – to collect health care tax and suppress any tax evasion.
It is heavily centralized and only the central administration can adjust the registered info in the data. So if you want to change your name, even the slightest change, you have to file an application at a national agency that processes your paperwork. This centralized population registry tends to make it achievable to determine who is who under all circumstances and it is important for the national well being care program. Otherwise, any individual could claim to be entitled.
To implement that in the United States needs a fully new doctrine for population registry and manage. In an American context that would call for that each and every existing driving license had to be voided and reapplied below stricter identification rules that would match not only data from Internal Revenue Service, state government, municipal government, Social Safety Administration, and Division of Homeland Security but pretty much any agency that gives services to the basic public. The reason why a new population registry would be necessary in the United States is the reality that lax rules dating back to the 1940s up till the War on Terrorism, and stricter identification criteria following 9/11, has created a considerable percentage of personal information and facts about individuals questionable.
If America alternatively neglects keeping secure records, determining eligibility for public health care would not be achievable and the floodgates for fraud would open and rampant misuse of the technique would prevail. This would ultimately bring down the technique.
It is financially impossible to produce a universal health care method without clearly realizing who is entitled and not. The program desires to have limits of its entitlement. A social safety number would not be sufficient as these numbers have been handed out via decades to temporary residents that may not even reside in the United States or could possibly these days be out of status as illegal immigrants.